<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outdustry.com/2009/07/06/free-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outdustry.com/2009/07/06/free-love/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:26:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://outdustry.com/2009/07/06/free-love/comment-page-1/#comment-7470</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outdustry.com/?p=539#comment-7470</guid>
		<description>Well done on your mention in the new book Ed. 

What I dont get is that if everyone pursues this FREE strategy, it leads to a positive supply side shock which is going to reduce the novelty value (less attention) and also the price the premium product would have gathered (less demand). 

Think, beggar thy neighbour. 

Hence the irony - if it is a really successful book, it will be a really unsuccesful theory. 

Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done on your mention in the new book Ed. </p>
<p>What I dont get is that if everyone pursues this FREE strategy, it leads to a positive supply side shock which is going to reduce the novelty value (less attention) and also the price the premium product would have gathered (less demand). </p>
<p>Think, beggar thy neighbour. </p>
<p>Hence the irony &#8211; if it is a really successful book, it will be a really unsuccesful theory. </p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
